Prediction of Miki Jankovic vs Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Jankovic vs W. Trongcharoenchaikul

Miki Jankovic
Miki Jankovic

Flag SRB SRB

l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul

Flag THA THA

l
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

31
Age
30
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
811
256
Best Rank
395
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$730
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Jankovic 0 - 0 Trongcharoenchaikul

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Jankovic0
Trongcharoenchaikul0
Last 0 H2H Matches:

No past h2h happened.

M. Jankovic vs W. Trongcharoenchaikul H2H Profile

Stats
$730Career Prize Money$0
62.04% (237-145)Career Total W/L48.28% (280-300)
4Titles2
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Jankovic vs W. Trongcharoenchaikul Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Miki Jankovic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has won 45.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Miki Jankovic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has won 40.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 22.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Miki Jankovic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has saved 59.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Miki Jankovic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul winning 42.86% (W/L 24/32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Miki Jankovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 162/94), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/10). Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 30/24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/10).
  • Player level: In the last year, Miki Jankovic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.68% of matches (W/L 21/26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Miki Jankovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has played against players with an average rank of 431.63.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Miki Jankovic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Miki Jankovic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul has converted 22.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Miki Jankovic vs Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Jankovic 0%, Trongcharoenchaikul 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jankovic 0%, Trongcharoenchaikul 46%.
Break Points Saved %: Jankovic 0%, Trongcharoenchaikul 64%.

M. Jankovic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayTurkey F30 (Istanbul) - 14-08-2017

R2

ITAA. Bega
L
6-4 6-2

R1

ESPS. Martos
W
6-2 6-3
ClayTurkey F29 (Mersin) - 07-08-2017

R2

TURS. Agabigun
L
3-6 6-3 6-4

R1

ARGF. Feitt
W
6-3 6-4
ClayTurkey F26 (Istanbul) - 17-07-2017

QF

FRAJ. Okala
L
6-3 6-4

W. Trongcharoenchaikul Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Sharm ElSheikh - 17-11-2025

R2

KAZZ. Nurlanuly
L
6-1 6-3

R1

POLW. Sasko
W
6-4 6-1
HardM15 Sharm ElSheikh - 10-11-2025

R2

SUIL. Staeheli
L
6-3 6-3

R1

EGYK. Ibrahim
W
6-4 6-2
I.hardTaipei Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

JPNM. Imamura
L
6-3 6-1
banner

M. Jankovic vs W. Trongcharoenchaikul Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
62.04% (237/145)YTD Win/Loss48.28% (280/300)
59.86% (513/344)Sets Win/Loss48.91% (651/680)
54.20% (4338/3665)Games Win/Loss49.63% (6378/6473)
62.38% (63/38)Hard Win/Loss47.81% (240/262)
63.28% (162/94)Clay Win/Loss55.56% (30/24)
48.00% (12/13)Indoor Hard W/L40.91% (9/13)
0% (0/0)Grass Win/Loss50.00% (1/1)
0.14Aces Per Game0.45
564Aces Total2809
0.05Double Faults Per Game0.21
179Total Double Faults1339
1st MatchAverage Match Time1:10:53
592.74Average Opponent Rank516.72
62% (5031/8111)1st Serve %61% (17622/29011)
72% (3604/5031)1st Serve Win %73% (12878/17622)
51% (1581/3080)2nd Serve Win %49% (5571/11390)
44% (358/811)Break Points Won % (Total)40% (864/2184)
40% (3289/8250)Return Points Win %35% (10010/28600)
0% (0/0)Cups W/L63.16% (12/7)
16.67% (1/5)Main Tour W/L0.00% (0/1)
50.85% (30/29)Challenger W/L37.23% (35/59)
64.98% (206/111)Futures W/L50.00% (233/233)
63% (230/368)Best of 3 Sets Win %49% (267/545)
60% (3/5)Best of 5 Sets Win %43% (9/21)
55% (66/120)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)52% (114/221)
58% (57/99)Deciding Set Win %50% (83/166)
89% (228/204)1st Set Won, Won Match82% (279/229)
9% (228/21)1st Set Won, Lost Match16% (279/44)
21% (153/32)1st Set Lost, Won Match16% (300/48)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sat, 22 Nov, 04:30 PM
Prediction
BRAD. D. D. Silva
BRAG. Heide
W1
3.4
W2
1.26
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
CHIB. Malla7
CHIB. Torrealba4
W1
1.27
W2
3.34
Sat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
Prediction
BELJ. VandrommeWC
UZBM. Timofeeva6
W1
2.68
W2
1.4
Sat, 22 Nov, 10:00 PM
Prediction
ITAF. Maestrelli8
GERJ. Engel
W1
1.85
W2
1.83
Sat, 22 Nov, 01:02 PM
Prediction
CZEL. Havlickovaq
FRAJ. Ponchet3
W1
1.71
W2
1.99
Sat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
Prediction
GBRA. Mchugh4
NORA. Petrovicq
W1
1.29
W2
3.2